State v. Shore
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court committed prejudicial and reversible error in admitting evidence of alleged identification of defendant from fingerprints and photographs taken while defendant was allegedly illegally detained. Defendant also contends that identification of defendant by witnesses for the State in the hallway of the police station during illegal detention deprived defendant of his constitutional rights of due process, and admission into evidence of such identification constituted reversible error.
At the conclusion of voir dire examination with respect…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. WingardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meadows v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975