State v. Shaw
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Per curiam
Roger Shaw appeals his conviction of involuntary manslaughter while driving under the influence of alcohol. For the first time on appeal, Shaw argues that we must reverse his conviction because the district court instructed the jury on multiple alternative means of committing the crime and the State failed to present sufficient evidence of each alternative means. In addition, Shaw contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights by sentencing him based in part on his criminal history without first requiring that the criminal history be alleged in the complaint and proven…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CheffenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Friends of Bethany Place, Inc. v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. Cato-PerryCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- State v. ShayCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019