In the Interest of N.C. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING
2Per curiam
Sua sponte we grant rehearing and substitute the following for our previous opinions:
We reverse appellant’s adjudication of delinquency for grand theft of an automobile. Appellant’s “mere presence as an after-acquired passenger in a vehicle, with knowledge that it has been stolen, [was] insufficient to convict [him] of [automobile] theft.” State v. G.C., 572 So.2d 1380, 1382 (Fla.1991).
Although section 924.34 of the Florida Statutes (1989) gives an appellate court the authority to direct a trial court to enter judgment for a lesser offense, the supreme court recently held in Gould…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Gould v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- State v. G.C.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
4Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SiglerSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- I.T. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Behn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Paige v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- I.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.