Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Amick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 17, 1984No. 61459PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Vice Chief Justice:

Petitioner, Allstate, defendant below, requests this Court to assume original jurisdiction and prohibit the trial court from further proceeding in a Christian type action predicated upon the theory that Allstate failed to negotiate, fairly and in good faith, a settlement with the third-party plaintiff on behalf of Allstate’s insured.

We assume original jurisdiction for the purpose of clarifying certain language in Timmons v. Royal Globe Ins. Co., Okl., 653 P.2d 907 (1982) and GRANT PROHIBITION.

Plaintiffs below, Donald and Sherry Phillips, brought an action to recover…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. First Bank of Turley v. Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Roach v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Elmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API