Legal Opinion

Eason v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1941No. 5 Div. 121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

Bastardy prosecution under Chapter 85, Code 1923, Sections 3416 et sequitur, Code 1940, Tit. 6, § 1 et seq. From an adverse judgment, upon trial in the circuit court, the defendant appeals to this court.

There was a material conflict in the evidence. That for the State substantially proved each element of the charge, whereas the testimony of the defendant and his witnesses supported his claim of innocence. In such circumstances, the court acted correctly in submitting the case to the jury for decision. There was no impropriety, therefore, in refusing to the defendant his request…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. Gafford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Gregory v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Corona Coal Co. v. SextonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. McClain v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lurton Lewis Heflin, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Eason v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Hulsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Mizell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API