Legal Opinion
United States v. Brainer
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 4, 1981No. Crim. Y-80-0253PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
The defendant, William Brainer, filed a motion to dismiss the indictment in this case for lack of a speedy trial. He made no allegation that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment but relied entirely upon the lack of compliance with the statutorily mandated time limits set forth in the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, as amended, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 et seq. [hereinafter, the “Act”]. Specifically, the defendant asserted that his trial on the scheduled date would result in a violation of 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- United States v. William Brainer, Eugene Gressman, Esq., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- In Interest of KupperionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Coate v. OmholtMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.