Legal Opinion

Melenky v. Melen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

At the March term we affirmed without opinion the judgment of the Special Term entered upon the report of an official referee. (206 App. Div. 649.)

The learned counsel for the appellant urges with great earnestness that we have overlooked important reasons why the judgment should be reversed, based both upon the facts and upon the law, and calls our attention to additional authorities. We have thought it advisable, therefore, to state formally our views concerning this litigation.

*48The action is brought to have deeds, absolute on their face, declared to be mortgages, and for an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Horn v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Odell v. . MontrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Tilyou v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Ensign v. . EnsignNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Melenky v. . MelenNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tansil v. McCumberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Chase National Bank v. ToverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Davitt v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API