Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 8, 1984No. Nos. 1756, 1770PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Chief Judge.

We have consolidated these two appeals, State v. Armstrong, No. 1756, and State v. Jones, No. 1770, both September Term, 1983, into one opinion because both cases involve the same law, i. e., the subsequent offender statute. Md.Ann.Code art. 27, § 643B. See also former Md.Rule 734. Each case originated in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County; one is concerned with the notice to the defendant of the State’s intent to seek increased punishment of the defendant, and the other concerns the prior incarceration requirement. Failing in its efforts, the State has appealed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BundyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. State v. ThurmondCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. State v. MontgomeryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API