Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 26, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered on or about June 23, 1989, which, inter alia, following a jury verdict on the question of liability in favor of plaintiff against defendants and apportioning liability 30% against defendant Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA) and 70% against defendant the City of New York, set aside the verdict against the City of New York and found in favor of plaintiff against defendant MABSTOA, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, the verdict against the City of New York reinstated and, as modified,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. FernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Candelier v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Krause v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gross v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Ajayi v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Napoli v. Ambus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Blake v. BELL'S TRUCKING, INC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  5. King v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API