State v. Schieneman
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Hannibal Court of Common Pleas. Wagn. Stat. 504, § 80 ; Vaughn vs. State, 4 Mo. 580; State vs. Ross, 25 Mo. 426 ; Com. vs./ Welch, 1 Gray, 324-7 ; State vs. Coulter, 46 Mo. 564 ; State vs. Swadley, 15 Mo. 515. State vs. Bankhead, 25 Mo. 558 ; State vs. Mitchell, 25 Mo. 420; State vs. Hopper, 27 Mo. 599 ; State vs. Edwards, 32 Mo. 549 ; State vs. Stubblefield, 32 Mo. 563; State vs. Jasper, 4 Dev. [N. C.] 323 ; Whart.
Read the full summary
Error to Hannibal Court of Common Pleas. Wagn. Stat. 504, § 80 ; Vaughn vs. State, 4 Mo. 580; State vs. Ross, 25 Mo. 426 ; Com. vs./ Welch, 1 Gray, 324-7 ; State vs. Coulter, 46 Mo. 564 ; State vs. Swadley, 15 Mo. 515. State vs. Bankhead, 25 Mo. 558 ; State vs. Mitchell, 25 Mo. 420; State vs. Hopper, 27 Mo. 599 ; State vs. Edwards, 32 Mo. 549 ; State vs. Stubblefield, 32 Mo. 563; State vs. Jasper, 4 Dev. [N. C.] 323 ; Whart. Prec. £2 Ed.] § 861; Bell vs. Graham, 1 Nott & McC. [S. O.] 278.
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, Judge
The defendant was indicted in the Hannibal court of common pleas for disturbing religious worship. On motion of defendant the indictment was quashed, and to review this action of the court the case is brought here by the State on a writ of error. The indictment alleges that “defendant at,” etc., “ a congregation and assembly of people, then and there being met for religious worship, at the southeast corner of the public square in the city of Hannibal, then and there, unlawfully,” etc., “ did disquiet and disturb the congregation and assembly of people then and there met for religious worship,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- State v. KindrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
- State v. StegallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
- State v. KarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- State v. AlfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.