Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Board of Health

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1891Published

Appeal by tbe plaintiffs, Frank W. Malloy and William Y. Malloy, from a judgment entered in the office of the clerk of Westchester county on the 4th day of April, 1891, in favor of the defendant, for costs, after a trial at the Westchester Circuit before the court and a jury. The defendant accepted the plaintiffs’ bid to build a sewer in the town of Mamaroneck for $445, which sewer was to drain certain cellars which had been declared by defendant to be a nuisance.

Read the full summary

Appeal by tbe plaintiffs, Frank W. Malloy and William Y. Malloy, from a judgment entered in the office of the clerk of Westchester county on the 4th day of April, 1891, in favor of the defendant, for costs, after a trial at the Westchester Circuit before the court and a jury. The defendant accepted the plaintiffs’ bid to build a sewer in the town of Mamaroneck for $445, which sewer was to drain certain cellars which had been declared by defendant to be a nuisance. This action was brought to recover the amount of said bid, less certain payments which had been made thereon.

1Opinion of the Court

Barnard, P. J.:

The plaintiffs performed work under a contract with the defendant. The expense was a town charge. (Laws of 1885, chap. 270.) The Board of Health has no place as a defendant. It is a town agency only. The claim must be presented to the town auditors for audit. (Myers v. Barnes, 114 N. Y., 324; People ex rel. Board of Health, etc., v. Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, 18 Barb., 567; Bell v. Town of Esopus, 49 id., 506.)

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Pratt, J., concurred; Dticman, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Board of Health v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1854