Legal Opinion
(PC)Arceo v. Tetreault
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 15, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02339Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ARCEO, No. 2:20-cv-2339 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 GABRIELLE TETREFAULT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff is a civil detainee, proceeding without counsel, and has requested leave to 19 proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is subject to civil commitment under the Sexual Violent 20 Predator Act (“SVPA”) and California Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 6600 et seq.; such civil 21 detainees are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.