Legal Opinion

Clark v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

The plaintiff, an adult in full possession of all his faculties, entered upon the defendant’s property at Nashua with the design of crossing its right of way from west to east at the Nashua station. At that point the defendant’s main line runs north and south and is double tracked, the westerly rails being used for southbound, and the easterly for northbound traffic. At the time of the accident, May 26, 1931, about quarter of seven in the morning, there was a freight train going north on the easterly tracks. The plaintiff looked north as he entered upon the westerly or southbound tracks, saw…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. AshworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Frost v. StevensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  2. Smith v. Lillian v. Donahue TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. Sarkise v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  4. Legere v. New England Furniture Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  5. Hanson v. N. H. Pre-Mix Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API