Legal Opinion

State v. McGinnis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1984No. 8326SC1004PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that his rights under the 5th and 14th amendments of the United States Constitution were violated by the state’s attempt to impeach him with evidence of his post-arrest silence.

We first address defendant’s 14th amendment due process argument. In Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976), the Supreme Court held that a defendant’s silence at the time of arrest and after receiving Miranda warnings could not be used to impeach his testimony at trial. The Miranda 1 decision requires that a person taken into custody be advised, inter alia,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. CastorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. TullySupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  5. Mattox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API