Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Chesbro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment was rendered in an action in which the court had jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject-matter. The judgment, although an unusual one, seems equitable. Far from appealing from the judgment, the moving parties, who now ask that the judgment be vacated and set aside, acted under it to secure an advantage awarded to them by the judgment. This fact alone should deprive them of the privilege of vacating the judgment. But it is well settled that, where the court has jurisdie*595tion, its judgment cannot be attacked for error by motion. An appeal is the appropriate remedy. (Fisher…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisher v. . HepburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harlem Savings Bank v. Salvador Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Tomoser v. HegyiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. Miller v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API