Legal Opinion

Garsen v. Hohenleitner

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 1, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Landlord’s notice to tenants dated December 11, 1971, purportedly given pursuant to subdivision f of section 52 of the New York City Rent, Eviction and Rehabilitation Regulations, directing them to “ remove from the apartment you occupywas not a sufficient notice terminating the tenancy (Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant [2d ed.], § 1023; cf. Real Property Law, § 232-a). It was not definite and unequivocal. It did not state that landlord elected to terminate the tenancy. Moreover, the two stated grounds for the notice were (1) that tenants had installed new locks on the entrance door to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Drake v. ComptrollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leland House, Inc. v. WigfallAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
  2. Carriage Court Inn, Inc. v. RainsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
  3. RP Wimbledon Owner, LLC v. Chisholm, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County2025
  4. RP Wimbledon Owner, LLC v. Chisholm, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API