Legal Opinion

Borum v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 26, 2015No. 2014EAB1652; A158304Published

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (board) that affirmed an order of the Employment Department that claimant must repay Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) and Federal Additional Compensation (FAC) in the amount of $11,884 that claimant was paid during the periods October 17, 2010 through January 1, 2011, and February 27, 2011 through June 4, 2011. We review the board’s order “for substantial evidence and errors of law, and to determine whether [its] analysis comports with substantial reason,” SAIF v. Ramos, 252 Or App 361, 363, 287 P3d 1220…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saif Corp. v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Nichols v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API