Legal Opinion

Niemann v. Niemann

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 11, 1984No. 0199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

This appeal is from a divorce decree granted to Mrs. Niemann (the wife) on the statutory ground of continuous separation for a year. We affirm.

Mr. Niemann (the husband), a naval officer, was on involuntary sea duty during seven months of the one year period. He contends that the inclusion of the time spent on involuntary sea duty towards the twelve months needed for a no-fault divorce in South Carolina is contrary to public policy and a violation .of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. We disagree.

Whether time spent out of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benson v. BensonNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Nolletti v. NollettiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Mogensky v. MogenskySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Floyd v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Gardner v. GardnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sinha v. SinhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Sinha v. SinhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API