Legal Opinion

Burnam v. Banks

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Fourth District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

Plaintiff and defendant were both residents of Boone county, ■ Mo., and entered into a written contract to exchange lands ; that of the plaintiff being a farm in said Boone county, which he *350agreed to give for a place near Nashville, Term. Before the time for carrying the contract into effect he visited Tennessee, found the property, became dissatisfied with it and with the country, returned to Missouri, and commenced this proceeding to rescind the contract. He charges in his petition, first, a misdescription of the land, and second, fraudulent misrepresentations of its condition and value.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hinton v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. Rubey v. Missouri Coal & Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Des Moines City Railway v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Zenith Box & Lumber Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Forest View Land Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API