Legal Opinion

United States v. Kee Ho

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 31, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Indictment for Importing Contrary to Law. Kee Ho and Lee Ark were indicted for importing opium contrary to law.

1Opinion of the CourtHeady, J.

The indictment in this case is found under section 3082 of the Revised Statutes, the same being section 4 of the act of July 18, 1866, (14 St. 179,) entitled “An act further to prevent smuggling, and for other purposes.” It provides that “if any person shall fraudulently or knowingly import or bring into the United States, or assist in so do*334ing, any merchandise contrary to law, or shall receive, conceal, buy, sell, or in any manner facilitate the transportation, concealment, or sale of such merchandise after importation, knowing the same to have been imported contrary to law, such merchandise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  2. Ruehl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. Sierra v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1916
  4. United States v. One Blue Taffeta Evening Coat, Trimmed Lace, & Other Women's ClothingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API