Legal Opinion
Barry M. Cornish v. Marion C. Blakey, Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 18, 2003No. 02-2912PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Chief Judge.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued an aircraft mechanic eertifi-cate to Barry Cornish. See 14 C.F.R. pt. 65, subp. D. Cornish submitted a urine specimen for the random drug testing required of “safety-sensitive” employees of regulated air carriers. See 49 U.S.C. § 45102(a); 14 C.F.R. § 121.457(a); 14 C.F.R. pt. 121, app. I, §§ III(E), V. The testing laboratory found the specimen adulterated. The FAA Administrator treated the adulteration as equivalent to refusing to be tested and revoked Cornish’s mechanic certificate. See 49 U.S.C. § 44709(b)(1)(A); 14 C.F.R.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States Department of Labor v. Kast Metals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Martha B. Gaunce v. Pierre H. Devincentis and Jack T. ParrishCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- William Wise Robinson v. James E. Dow and Philip M. SwatekCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alpharma, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Pennfield Oil Company, Doing Business as Pennfield Animal Health, a Nebraska CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- The School of the Ozarks, Inc. v. Joseph Biden, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. Bureau of Indian AffairsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2006
- Alpharma v. Pennfield Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Barry M. Cornish v. FAACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.