Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. Kingsley
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 30, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
97 N.J. Super. 286 (1967)
235 A.2d 40
LAURENCE ROSENTHAL AND WILLIAM L. KRONTHAL, EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF AMOS STEINHARDT DECEASED, APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM KINGSLEY, ACTING DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 9, 1967.
Decided October 30, 1967.
Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.
Mr. Alfred J. Grosso argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Grosso, Beck & Mangino, attorneys).
Mr. Jeffrey R. Lowe, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Campanari v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
- Tracy v. AlexanderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Bassett v. NeeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of GibertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Estate of LambertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- La Greca v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1995
- In Re the Estate of RomnesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979