Legal Opinion

Allen v. totes/Isotoner Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2009No. 2008-0845Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Allen v. totes/Isotoner Corp., 123 Ohio St.3d 216,

2009-Ohio-4231.] ALLEN, APPELLANT, v. TOTES/ISOTONER CORPORATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Allen v. totes/Isotoner Corp., 123 Ohio St.3d 216,

2009-Ohio-4231.] Employment discrimination — Burden of proof — Summary judgment — Failure to follow directions is a legitimate reason for discharge — Judgment affirmed. (No. 2008-0845 — Submitted March 11, 2009 — Decided August 27, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA2007-08-196. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This case arises from a grant of summary judgment in favor…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API