State v. Henry
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
133 N.J. 104 (1993)
627 A.2d 125
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
VIVIAN HENRY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 4, 1993.
Decided July 19, 1993.
Deborah Bartolomey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
William P. Robertson, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.
This appeal concerns the validity of a "buy-bust" operation that resulted in the arrest and conviction of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.