Legal Opinion

State v. Henry

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 19, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

133 N.J. 104 (1993)

627 A.2d 125

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

VIVIAN HENRY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 4, 1993.

Decided July 19, 1993.

Deborah Bartolomey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

William P. Robertson, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

This appeal concerns the validity of a "buy-bust" operation that resulted in the arrest and conviction of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API