Union Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Craddock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court, Fort Smith District. Fdgar F. Bryant, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. The St. Paul German Insurance Company, being a foreign corporation, and doing business under the laws of Minnesota, with its home office or domicil at the city of St. Paul, in that State, desiring to transact business in this State, fully complied with the statutes in respect to the appointment of an agent and other things required in the laws regulating insurance in…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court, Fort Smith District. Fdgar F. Bryant, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. The St. Paul German Insurance Company, being a foreign corporation, and doing business under the laws of Minnesota, with its home office or domicil at the city of St. Paul, in that State, desiring to transact business in this State, fully complied with the statutes in respect to the appointment of an agent and other things required in the laws regulating insurance in this State, and filed its bond, as required by the provisions of the act approved March 6, 1891, and previous acts…
1Opinion of the Court
Bunn, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The first contention of the appellant is that the service of summons on the defendant insurance company by Boyd & Shelby as its agents was insufficient to compel its attendance, and that no valid judgment could, therefore, be rendered against it, and that the judgment rendered herein is void ; and that for that reason the summons, served upon the appellant in Pulaski county to appear in the said Sebastian circuit court is also void—in other words, is not such service as is authorized by statute to be binding upon it.
1. Service of process on foreign…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- City Fire Insurance v. CarrugiSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Grider v. Apperson & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
- Erb v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spratley v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Stiewel v. BormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Harrison v. Bank of FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- W. T. Adams Machine Co. v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Sanderson v. BishopU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Arkansas · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.