Legal Opinion

Razatos v. Daniels & Fisher Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 2, 1942No. 14,967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

Action as in replevin by a chattel mortgagee to recover refrigerators and ranges in an apartment house. The holders of a second mortgage on the apartment-house property intervened and challenged the validity of the chattel mortgage on the grounds, as stated: (1) That the acknowledgment was defective; (2) that assuming interveners had actual knowledge of the chattel mortgage, not admitted, but denied, the pleadings did not present such issue; (3) that the chattels involved became fixtures, hence were not subject to chattel lien. Plaintiff made ample denial, and prevailed at trial. By their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Commercial Finance Co. v. Brooksville Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Fred W. Wolf Co. v. Hermann Savings BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. J. D. Best & Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Dawson v. Scruggs-Vandervoort Barney Realty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neves v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Stapp v. Carb-Ice Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. Rabtoay General Tire Co. v. Colorado Kenworth Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Neves v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API