Legal Opinion · Dissent

Talbott, Commissioner of Finance v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 17, 1941Published

1Dissent

Dinning, Special Judge

(dissenting).

Because of the public importance of the question involved in this case, the minority deems it proper to state the reasons whicii impel us to dissent.

We believe that the benefits which the General Assembly by Chapter 131, Acts of 1940, granted to the judges of the Court of Appeals upon retirement from office under the conditions therein stated are not pay or compensation, but gratuities, given by a grateful people in recognition of public services; that the power to enact such legislation is inherent in the General Assembly unless prohibited by the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. State ex rel. Dudgeon v. LevitanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Craig v. O'RearCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. People Ex Rel. Donovan v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API