Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Franklin County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The special act which authorizes the issuance of these bonds provides that “they shall be made payable exclusively out of taxes to be levied in such district, except the board of county commissioners may pay from county funds any part of the principal and interest of said bonds, . . .” (Sec. 6, Ch. 1078, S.L. 1957) (Italics added.)

The plaintiffs rest their appeal primarily upon the provision of the statute italicized above, and contend that the bonds will be debts of Franklin County by virtue of this provision. They urge that this provision when interpreted in context is valid and imports a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Commissioners v. . BoringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Carr v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API