Legal Opinion

People v. Arthur

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9511Published

Error to Logan District Court, Hon. Haslett P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The plaintiffs in error brought this action in mandamus to compel the defendant, county treasurer of Logan County, to collect from the defendants, irrigation districts, a' commission of two per cent of the amount of taxes levied by such districts, and collected by him as county treasurer, it being alleged that such county treasurer refused to make such collection, but on the contrary persists in charging each of said districts the sum of $100.00 for such service, as provided by statute, and alleging the statute in question is unconstitutional and void.

The defendants separately demurred to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. Otero Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API