Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1989No. 87-1237PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FORET, Judge.

Harold Mitchell, appellant herein, filed a rule to show cause why alimony payable to Alice Tynes, appellee, should not be terminated or reduced. The trial court rejected Mitchell’s demands, and he appealed. We reverse.

FACTS

Alice and Harold Mitchell were married on April 8, 1982.1 Alice left the family domicile on or about July 18, 1983. The record reflects that Harold filed a petition for separation in Vernon Parish based on abandonment on or about July 22, 1983, while Alice filed a petition for final divorce in Natchitoches Parish on July 18, 1984, based upon a one-year…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. BernhardtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Nethken v. NethkenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. Shows v. ShowsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Shows v. ShowsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API