Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Ensign-Bickford Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 3, 1973No. 55561PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Chief Justice.

We granted defendants permission to appeal from the district court interlocutory order granting defendant to cross-petition a change of venue to the county of his residence. Only defendant Quick Supply Company has perfected this appeal. We reverse.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought actions in Polk County. Quick’s principal place of business alleging dynamite fuses purchased by plaintiff Jack Cooley, which subsequently caused him serious injury, were manufactured by defendant Ensign-Bickford Company and sold by Quick to the retailer Everett Mateer. Plaintiffs sued only…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Directors of Independent School District v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Cramer v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Mahaska County State Bank v. CristSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Brown v. HoldenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Ryan v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rush v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. In the Interest of MeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Richards v. Anderson Erickson Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Buchhop v. General Growth Properties & General Growth Management Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Turner v. Midwest Development Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API