Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Mead
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 6, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2021-0215Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHANISE-MARIE ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-215 (JEB) KENNETH MICHAEL MEAD, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Shanise-Marie Alexander filed this action on January 24, 2021, alleging that a group of ten Defendants are at fault for “negligence, concealment of documents, privacy breach, slander and defamation of character, wrongful trespass, false arrest, false confinement, and tortuous [sic] [in]terference.” ECF No. 5 (Amended Compl.), ¶ 6 (alteration in original). In short — and as far as the Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Andre L. Phillips v. Richard P. Seiter, Glenn Watson v. Jeffrey J. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Pendleton v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Ellis-Smith v. Secretary of the ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.