Legal Opinion
Rippley v. Frazer
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Motion for'a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The facts upon which this motion is based are undisputed.
*416The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendant. At the close of the evidence a motion was made for a non-suit. Decision upon this motion was reserved, and the court submitted to the jury three questions for their consideration: (1) Was the defendant guilty of negligence which caused the injury to the plaintiff? (2) Was the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence? (3) What damages were caused to the plaintiff by the accident complained of?
T…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dalrymple v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Douglass v. TouseyNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Hodgkins v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- People v. DouglassNew York Supreme Court · 1825
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spielter v. North German Lloyd Steamship Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- International Madison Bank & Trust Co. v. SilvermanNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- Rippley v. FrazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Anderson v. Illinois Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Eagle v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.