Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. Klein
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*965OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The board found and the evidence sustains the finding that the land cannot yield a reasonable return as zoned, the cost of constructing residences being more than three times the potential sales price; that the grant of a variance permitting use for a period of 15 years as enclosed tennis courts would not change or impair the character of the adjacent properties or significantly affect traffic or pollution; and that the owner’s difficulty arises from the swampy nature of his property. Thus, the essentials…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Jayne Estates, Inc. v. RaynorNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- BEATRICE BLOCK CLUB ASSOC. v. FacenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- MATTER OF DOUGLASTON CIVIC ASS'N, INC. v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Harrison v. Mayor of BatesvilleMississippi Supreme Court · 2011