Legal Opinion

Boring v. Harber

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 13, 1927No. 17362PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

W. E. Harber, as plaintiff, sued A. A. Mayhue, O. M. Boring, W. O. Boring, W. J. Miller, and Amos F. Cruce, as defendants in the district court of Seminole county to recover the W. % of the N. E. % and the N. E. % .of the N. W, % of section 10, township 9 north, range 6 east. We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court.

On June 2, 1921, J. Q, Mayhue executed a deed in favor of the plaintiff, W. E. Har-ber, covering the 120 acres of land involved in this' cause. This deed was admitted by all parties to be a mortgage and was 'given to secure an indebtedness due to Harber and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Burden v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Daughtry v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Malernee v. DriebelbisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API