Legal Opinion

Jolley v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided December 17, 1980No. Motion No. M-24153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerard M. Weisberg, J.

The question presented is whether the affirmation of an attorney, albeit one professing experience in medical malpractice litigation, is competent to establish that a proposed claim “appears to be meritorious”. (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd 6.) We hold that it does not, and that as a general rule, a physician’s affidavit or affirmation must be submitted to permit the late filing of a claim for medical malpractice.

On March 21,1979, claimant Lillian Jolley was delivered of a child by Caesarean section at the Downstate Medical Center (Downstate), a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Santana v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Sessa v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Sessa v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Sessa v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
  5. Williams v. GiattiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Witko v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Nyberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Colson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API