Legal Opinion

Hagenlocher v. . the C.I. B.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1885PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought to recover damages for an injury received by the plaintiff from the alleged negligence of the defendant. On the trial, after the injury and the circumstances under which it occurred, and the condition of the plaintiff thereafter had been proved, one of her witnesses was asked the following question: "What expressions did she (the plaintiff) make, or what manifestations, showing that she suffered pain?" This was objected to, as immaterial and incompetent and the objections were overruled, and the witness answered: "Why, you could not lift her, nor do any thing with her,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caldwell v. . MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1854

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davidson v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Roche v. . Brooklyn City Newtown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Broyles v. PrisockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Williams v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API