Mississippi Shipbuilding Corporation v. . Lever Bros. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
On the argument of this case and in the briefs no reference whatever was made to the law which should govern the contract in question. The contract was made and executed in New York, and we assumed in the absence of comment upon so vital a point that the law of New York governed. We, therefore, in our opinion referred to section 130 of the Personal Property Law (Cons, Laws, ch. 41) and its requirements regarding notice.
As to notice we said: “We suggest these matters without attempting to decide them as we cannot tell what the evidence may be on a new trial. Kerr may appear as a witness. The…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Simpson v. LoehmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1968