Legal Opinion

Snively v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 22, 1953No. Docket No. 31896Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Rice, Judge:

The respondent argues that under the provisions of section 24 (b)1 of the Code, Lake Eloise may not deduct a loss on account of the sale of its assets to the Snively Trust because it arose from a sale between a corporation and an individual, or group of individuals, who were indirect owners of more than 50 per cent in value of Lake Eloise’s stock. Section 24(b) (1) (B). Or, in the alternative, the loss in not deductible because it arose from a sale between members of a family. Section 24 (b) (1) (A).

The respondent’s argument with respect to this first issue is that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. McWilliams v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Coast Carton Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Norie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  5. Whetstone v. Coslick, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API