Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cooperstein v. . Eden Brick Supply Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1924Published

1DissentMcLaughlin, J.

I dissent. To justify the jury in rendering a verdict in favor of the plaintiff it had to find not only that the "defendant was negligent, but that the intestate was free from negligence. The evidence was sufficient to justify a finding that defendant was negligent, but the record is absolutely barren of any evidence which would justify a finding that the intestate exercised any care whatever as to her own safety; on the contrary, the evidence is that she did not exercise any care from the time she left the sidewalk until she was struck by defendant’s car. The plaintiff’s witness Ida Monstein…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knapp v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Zucker v. . WhitridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Peterson v. . Ballantine SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Mastin v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Ford v. New York City Interborough Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API