Legal Opinion

In re Auriemma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court on February 21, 1984. He was admitted to practice in New Jersey in 1971.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order reciprocally disciplining respondent pursuant to section 806.19 of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.19) based upon his disbarment in New Jersey on February 18, 1997. Respondent has submitted an affidavit in mitigation.

Respondent consented to his permanent disbarment by the *568Supreme Court of New Jersey in an affidavit in which he conceded that he could not successfully defend himself against a charge…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of LaurenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API