Legal Opinion

Stoddard v. Courtright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1902No. Docket No. 133Published

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Assumpsit by John L. Stoddard against Morris L. Courtright upon a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

For some time prior to 1887, Edward C. Hargrave and his father, Edward J. Hargrave, owned mill property at Bay City, and were engaged in the business of manufacturing lumber and salt. The business was carried on in the name of E. J. Hargrave & Son. The father died in 1887. It is the claim of defendant that, after the death of Edward J. Hargrave, Elizabeth W. Hargrave, the widow of E. J. Hargrave, and Edward C. Hargrave, continued the business together under the old firm name of E. J. Hargrave & Son, until the firm failed in January, 1896. In the fall of 1895 Mrs,» Hargrave went to England;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Starling v. Supreme Council Royal Templars of TemperanceMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Little v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Wolf v. HoltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API