Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Yadon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 2011No. 36705-2009PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment holding that the Plaintiffs are beneficiaries of a resulting trust in land titled in the names of the Defendants. We affirm the judgment.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In the late 1990’s, George and Joann Kelley wanted to purchase a 670-acre farm, but they had neither the cash nor the credit to do so. They persuaded a friend to purchase the farm, and then they, their nephew, and one of their daughters entered into a lease of the property with an option to purchase it.

As the expiration of the lease and option to purchase was drawing near…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hogg v. WolskeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Crowley v. CritchfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Carroll v. MBNA America BankIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. KMST, LLC. v. County of AdaIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hettinga v. SybrandyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jane Doe (2015-03) v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. McDevitt v. Sportsman's Warehouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Steven J. Snider v. Ronald D. ArnoldIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Kennedy v. SchneiderIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Dennis J. Sallaz and Marcy Fox v. Eugene (Roy) RiceIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API