Loonie v. Frank
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. George H. Hoonan. The opinion states all the facts necessary for it to be properly understood. The record is voluminous, and able briefs were filed by counsel. Eighteen assignments of error were made by appellant, notice and argument on which are omitted, in view of the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Bonner, Associate Justice.
The plaintiff in this case, P. J. Loonie, as sub-contractor of Hyatt & Hinman, principal contractors, sues them for an alleged amount due from them for materials furnished and for work and labor performed in the erection of certain buildings in the city of San Antonio, on lots belonging to A. B. Frank and M. Goldfrank, and sues the said Frank and Goldfrank, but with whom he had no contract, for a personal judgment for said amount, and to enforce the mechanic’s lien therefor on said lots and buildings.
The written contract between the principal contractors and the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Pool v. SanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Sens v. TrentuneTexas Supreme Court · 1881