Legal Opinion

El Fresnal Irrigated Land Co. v. Bank of Washington

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1916No. 5593. [fn*]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cameron County ; W. B. Hopkins, Judge. Action by the Bank of Washington against the El Fresnal Irrigated Land Company. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals,

1Opinion of the CourtFlx, C. J.

This is a suit instituted by ap-pellee on two promissory notes for $750 each, purporting to have been executed by appellant to the San Benito Land & Water Company, and it sought the foreclosure of a lien on certain land. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of appellee for $1,955.25 and for the foreclosure of a lien on 2,000 acres of land.

The cause is brought to this court on the following agreed statement of facts:(1) “The defendant is a corporation incorporated and existing under the laws of Texas, for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and operating canals, ditches, flumes,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Ward v. City Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Alexander v. . CauldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Tempel v. DodgeTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Currie v. BowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Producers' Oil Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Prairie Lea Production Co. v. Lincoln Tank Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. The Praetorians v. SimonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Manufacturers' Equipment Co. v. Cisco Clay & Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Miles Realty Co. v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API