State v. Herman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
Defendant Neil Calvin Herman appeals from his conviction for first-degree rape. Because the trial court was correct in ruling that the defendant's testimony could be impeached by a jury verdict of guilty against him in a prior case not yet reduced to formal judgment and sentence, and because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow individual voir dire of potential jury members, we affirm the conviction.
I
Mr. Herman was arrested on August 25-26, 1977. He was charged with first-degree rape and a jury trial was set for October 24, 1977, in Pierce County Superior Court.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. RuzickaWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. TateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Matsen v. KaiserWashington Supreme Court · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- State v. WixonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- People v. McNeelyColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Jones v. Baltimore City Police Dept.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Kitsap County Republican Central Committee v. HuffWashington Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.