Hanel v. Freund
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from tlie St. Louis Circuit Court, Barclay, J. An employe, leaving before the end of his term without good cause, cannot recover. — Downs v. Smit, 15 Mo. App. 583 Harp v. Tyler, 73 Mo. 617; Henson v. Hampton, 32 Mo. 408; Aaron v. Moore, 34 Mo. 79 ; Teats v. Ballentine,. 56 Mo. 536.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This action was commenced before a justice of the-peace upon the following statement of claim:
“St. Louis, Mo., April 7th, 1884.
“L. Freund & Bro. to Hermann Hanel, Dr.
To 8J- days work done and performed, ending
April 6th, 1884, c. $24. $6.80.”'
The plaintiff had a judgment before the justice, and the defendant appealed to the circuit court. In the-circuit court the defendant did not appear on the day on which the case was called for trial, and a judgment was-rendered in favor of the plaintiff by default for $6.80, the sum above claimed. On the same day the defendant, by his counsel, filed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Plummer v. TrostSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Earp v. TylerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Stout v. St. Louis Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Fox v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1884
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gruetzner v. Aude Furniture Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1887
- Banse v. TateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Barnett v. SweringenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Hurck v. St. Louis Exposition & Music Hall Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- J. H. Rottman Distilling Co. v. Van FrankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.