Thorne v. State Bank of Platteville
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
The intervenor and appellant, State Bank of Platteville, contends that the circuit court had no jurisdiction of this matter and that the plaintiff, Thorne, had no subsisting lien upon the balance of the stock of goods in the hands of Webster at the time of his death. .
Assuming for the purposes of this case that one who, like the State Bank of Platteville, voluntarily petitions to become a party to a lawsuit then pending in a court can, after so intervening, properly be heard to assert that the very court to which it applied for leave to intervene is without jurisdiction of the subject matter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gianella v. BigelowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Merrill v. ComstockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Miller-Olcott Lumber Co. v. EllsworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Jones v. Citizens' Savings & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by1 opinion
- Savage v. PrattWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956