Legal Opinion

Raugust v. Abbey

District Court, D. Montana

Decided April 15, 2022No. 6:20-cv-00009Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION RICHARD RAUGUST, CV 20-09-H-DWM Plaintiff, VS. OPINION and ORDER WAYNE ABBEY, Defendant. This case stems from the wrongful conviction of Plaintiff Richard Raugust for the murder of Joe Tash. Raugust brings a

42 U.S.C. § 1983

claim against Defendant Wayne Abbey, a Sanders County deputy sheriff, premised on Abbey’s alleged failure to disclose evidence materially favorable to Raugust in violation of Brady v. Maryland,

373 U.S. 83

(1963). The crux of Raugust’s claim is that Abbey failed to disclose something he observed…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API