Legal Opinion

Hill v. State Board of Alcoholic Control

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1973No. 7310SC194Published

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

Petitioners contend that in order for them to be found in violation of G.S. 18A-25(b), it was necessary for the State to charge and prove that the liquor sold was purchased from a county or municipal store. G.S. 18A-25(b) prohibits the possession for sale, or sales, of any liquor pwrchased from any county or municipal store. While this statute is cited in the notice served upon petitioners, G.S. 18A-3(a) is also cited therein, and the uncontradicted evidence before the Board clearly shows that petitioners violated this section. G.S. 18A-3(a) provides that “[n]o person shall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. C'est Bon, Inc. v. NORTH CAROLINA BD. OF ALCOHOLIC CON.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API